In this item that he posted on his blog last November, Wayne Schiess mentions that when he was a full-time practicing lawyer, he thought he was a good writer. He says he now realizes that he was quite mediocre and unaware of his limitations. He poses the following question: “Many practicing lawyers today believe themselves […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 4 Comments »| Print this Post
St. John’s Law Review has just published my new article, Revisiting the Ambiguity of “And” and “Or” in Legal Drafting. My co-author is Alan S. Kaye, professor of English, comparative literature, and linguistics and director of the Laboratory of Phonetic Research at California State University, Fullerton. Click here to go to a copy of the […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 2 Comments »| Print this Post
It’s high time I tackled warranty and the related verb to warrant. Here’s my first stab at this topic.
Background
In this Business Law Today article and this follow-up blog post I demonstrate that it’s pointless and confusing to use the phrase represents and warrants (and representations and warranties) in a contract, or at least one governed […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 3 Comments »| Print this Post
Fans of overkill—if you like from the beginning of time, you’ll love throughout the universe. You can find it in rights-granting language, as in the following example (emphasis added):
Client shall have the sole and exclusive right throughout the universe in perpetuity to use and exploit all or any part of the Properties and all or […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 3 Comments »| Print this Post
In a recent post I discussed the terms hold harmless and indemnify. I noted that Black’s Law Dictionary states that the two terms have the same meaning whereas Mellinkoff’s Dictionary of American Legal Usage says that one can also distinguish the two terms—that “hold harmless is understood to protect another against the risk of loss […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 1 Comment »| Print this Post
Quite a few readers of this blog have signed up to be notified by email whenever I post a new item. But I suspect that there are those who find it a bit intrusive to receive an email from me once, twice, or three times a week. If that applies to you—and I know I’d […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 1 Comment »| Print this Post
I like to think that my recommendations regarding contract drafting fly under the radar—that most people who read an MSCD-compliant contract won’t find anything disconcertingly unfamiliar about it.
But corporate resolutions are a different matter. (By corporate resolutions, I mean the resolutions that the governing body of a legal entity adopts to memorialize its decisions.) When […]
Permalink | Email this Post | No Comments »| Print this Post
Now that the holidays have come and gone, allow me to take the liberty of reminding you that my two seminars with West Legalworks are fast approaching. The seminars are entitled Contract Drafting—Language and Layout and address topics I discuss in MSCD. I’ll be in New York on February 7th and in Atlanta on March […]
Permalink | Email this Post | No Comments »| Print this Post
I’ve never been fond of the phrase execute and deliver, so this weekend I took the opportunity to revisit it. My conclusions are modest enough. Here they are, in case anyone’s interested.
This phrase execute and deliver (and its counterpart execution and delivery) is a standard feature of English-language contracts. As in the following obligation: The […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 1 Comment »| Print this Post
One of the joys of being a contract-drafting guy is that I don’t have to dwell on the mess that results when courts have to make sense out of contract language that’s unclear. Instead, I focus on how to avoid such problems.
But it’s a good idea to look at case law every so often, if […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 1 Comment »| Print this Post
Today’s topic is warrants. By warrant, I mean an instrument granting the holder a long-term option to buy shares at a fixed price. (I discuss elsewhere the unrelated verb to warrant and noun warranty.)
A warrant is an intangible right, but it’s evidenced by a document. Many drafters don’t bother distinguishing between the two, in that […]
Permalink | Email this Post | 2 Comments »| Print this Post