While at LegalTech on Tuesday, I picked up a free copy of the New York Law Journal, just for the sheer novelty of reading it in newsprint. One item that caught my eye was an account of WebMD LLC v. RDA International Inc., No. 102830/08, 2009 WL 175036 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 6, 2009). (Click here to go to the … Read More
Reader Melvin told me about this item on Lexology by Jeffrey P. Drummond of Jackson Walker LLP. It’s about how the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court in a qui tam action brought by a doctor against a hospital under the False Claims Act. At issue was the relationship between the hospital and an anesthesiology group that … Read More
Included in the extensive comments to my recent post “Language Requiring Deletion of Electronic Files” is a comment by Michael Fleming to the effect that it’s appropriate to impose on a party receiving confidential information an obligation to destroy all electronic versions of that information, regardless of whether that’s in fact possible to do. Michael suggested that whether the party … Read More
I’ll soon be resuming my itinerant ways. In particular, my first public seminar of 2009 is on February 24, in Houston. And 2009 just got busier, as I’ve added some new “Contract Drafting—Language and Layout” public seminar dates, namely U.S. dates for the second half of 2009 and new Toronto and Vancouver dates. Click here for the details. Remember that … Read More
To accomplish any given drafting goal, one usage will be more efficient than the others. Once you accept that notion, it follows that it would make sense for drafters to join other writers in using a manual of style. That’s why I wrote A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. Use of a manual of style in a given population … Read More
Today Rees Morrision posted this item on his blog. It makes the point that groups are good for sharing information but not so good for making decisions. It also quotes an academic as saying that “Groups are not helpful in getting people to make better decisions, but they’re helpful in getting people to feel more confident about the decisions they’ve … Read More
This post earlier this month considered how to ensure that people on the other side of a deal don’t balk at MSCD-compliant language. But what if it’s your outside counsel that’s not playing along? In this post from last weekend I said that company law departments are best positioned to drive change, in that they’re the ones who pay the … Read More
In this post from earlier this month, I expressed incredulity at the idea of my being able to make good use of Twitter—what I do doesn’t come in installments of no more than 140 characters. But following up on a suggestion by commenter Jonathan Handel, I’ve arranged matters so that every time I post on the blog a tweet gets … Read More
A couple of recent posts (this one and this one) prompted some gnashing of teeth and rending of clothes by commenters frustrated at the pushback they encounter when they use clear, efficient, and modern contract language. So I thought it might be worthwhile for me to elaborate on something I offered in this comment. Here goes: I’m optimistic about the … Read More
Thanks to Bryan Sims of The Connected Lawyer, I came across (1) this useful post by TechnoEsq on the different ways of signing legal documents electronically and (2) this post by Ernie Svenson, wearing his PDF for Lawyers hat, on one of those ways of signing, namely using digital signatures. By way of a reminder, digital signatures form part of … Read More
